↓ Skip to main content

What do guidelines and systematic reviews tell us about the management of medically unexplained symptoms in primary care?

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 649)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
What do guidelines and systematic reviews tell us about the management of medically unexplained symptoms in primary care?
Published in
BJGP Open, August 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen17x101061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim C olde Hartman, Marianne Rosendal, Aase Aamland, Henriette E van der Horst, Judith GM Rosmalen, Chris D Burton, Peter LBJ Lucassen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#996,134
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#42
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,129
of 331,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.