↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Imitation Impairment in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanisms of Imitation Impairment in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10802-014-9874-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) have difficulties with imitation, though the nature of these remains unclear. In this study, involving 28 preschoolers with ASD (M age = 48 months; 90 % male), 17 matched children with Global Developmental Delay (GDD group; M age = 44 months; 53 % male) and 17 typically developing children (TD group, M age = 52 months; 65 % male), we found that preschoolers with ASD 1) imitate less frequently than both typically developing children and children with GDD; 2) when they do imitate, their imitation is less accurate than that of TD children but similar to that of children with GDD; 3) unlike participants in both comparison groups, preschoolers with ASD use emulation more often than imitation when copying others' actions; 4) they spend less time looking at the model's face and more time looking at her actions; and 5) attentional, social and executive factors underlie different aspects of imitation difficulties in this population. Implications for developmental models of autism are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 39 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 27%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 46 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#22,951,602
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,688
of 2,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,537
of 253,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.