↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of immunosenescence

Overview of attention for article published in Immunity & Ageing, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanisms of immunosenescence
Published in
Immunity & Ageing, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1742-4933-6-10
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

On April 7,8, 2009 a Symposium entitled "Pathophysiology of Successful and Unsuccessful Ageing" took place in Palermo, Italy. Here, the lectures of G. Pawelec, D. Dunn-Walters and. G. Colonna-Romano on T and B immunosenescence are summarized. In the elderly, many alterations of both innate and acquired immunity have been described. Alterations to the immune system in the older person are generally viewed as a deterioration of immunity, leading to the use of the catch-all term immunosenescence. Indeed, many immunological parameters are often markedly different in elderly compared to young people, and some, mostly circumstantial, evidence suggests that retained function of both innate and acquired immunity in the elderly is correlated with health status. What is often not clear from studies is how far immune dysfunction is a cause or an effect. A better understanding of immunosenescence and mechanisms responsible for proven deleterious changes is needed to maintain a healthy state in later life and to design possible therapeutic interventions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Materials Science 2 1%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 37 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2025.
All research outputs
#5,608,559
of 33,732,945 outputs
Outputs from Immunity & Ageing
#163
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,299
of 167,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunity & Ageing
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,732,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.