↓ Skip to main content

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Palliative Care, Version 2.2017.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Palliative Care, Version 2.2017.
Published in
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), August 2017
DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Dans, Thomas Smith, Anthony Back, Justin N Baker, Jessica R Bauman, Anna C Beck, Susan Block, Toby Campbell, Amy A Case, Shalini Dalal, Howard Edwards, Thomas R Fitch, Jennifer Kapo, Jean S Kutner, Elizabeth Kvale, Charles Miller, Sumathi Misra, William Mitchell, Diane G Portman, David Spiegel, Linda Sutton, Eytan Szmuilowicz, Jennifer Temel, Roma Tickoo, Susan G Urba, Elizabeth Weinstein, Finly Zachariah, Mary Anne Bergman, Jillian L Scavone

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Linguistics 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#9,461,202
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#1,007
of 2,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,262
of 357,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.