| Title |
GlycoDeNovo – an Efficient Algorithm for Accurate de novo Glycan Topology Reconstruction from Tandem Mass Spectra
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13361-017-1760-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pengyu Hong, Hui Sun, Long Sha, Yi Pu, Kshitij Khatri, Xiang Yu, Yang Tang, Cheng Lin |
| Abstract |
A major challenge in glycomics is the characterization of complex glycan structures that are essential for understanding their diverse roles in many biological processes. We present a novel efficient computational approach, named GlycoDeNovo, for accurate elucidation of the glycan topologies from their tandem mass spectra. Given a spectrum, GlycoDeNovo first builds an interpretation-graph specifying how to interpret each peak using preceding interpreted peaks. It then reconstructs the topologies of peaks that contribute to interpreting the precursor ion. We theoretically prove that GlycoDeNovo is highly efficient. A major innovative feature added to GlycoDeNovo is a data-driven IonClassifier which can be used to effectively rank candidate topologies. IonClassifier is automatically learned from experimental spectra of known glycans to distinguish B- and C-type ions from all other ion types. Our results showed that GlycoDeNovo is robust and accurate for topology reconstruction of glycans from their tandem mass spectra. Graphical Abstract ᅟ. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Ghana | 1 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 30% |
| Researcher | 8 | 22% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 7 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |