↓ Skip to main content

BLIMP1 Induces Transient Metastatic Heterogeneity in Pancreatic Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
BLIMP1 Induces Transient Metastatic Heterogeneity in Pancreatic Cancer
Published in
Cancer Discovery, October 2017
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0250
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most metastatic and deadly cancers. Despite the clinical significance of metastatic spread, our understanding of molecular mechanisms that drive PDAC metastatic ability remains limited. Using a novel genetically engineered mouse model of human PDAC, we uncover a transient subpopulation of cancer cells with exceptionally high metastatic ability. Global gene expression profiling and functional analyses uncovered the transcription factor Blimp1 as a key driver of PDAC metastasis. The highly metastatic PDAC subpopulation is enriched for hypoxia-induced genes and hypoxia-mediated induction of Blimp1 contributes to the regulation of a subset of hypoxia-associated gene expression programs. These findings support a model in which up-regulation of Blimp1 links microenvironmental cues to a metastatic stem cell character.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Master 6 6%
Professor 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 29 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#9,941,602
of 29,042,824 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#2,139
of 4,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,317
of 339,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#30
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,042,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.