↓ Skip to main content

Poverty and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Poverty and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms
Published in
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, January 2014
DOI 10.1037/h0098735
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Longitudinal data on non-Hispanic White children from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (N = 1,056) were used to examine whether the relationship between poverty (early childhood poverty, poverty persistence, and current poverty) and adolescent depressive symptoms (measured by the Children's Depression Inventory and the Internalizing Index) can be explained by the mother's own childhood depression and family characteristics measured during the child's first year of life. Associations between poverty and depressive symptoms among adolescents were explained by mother's childhood depression and whether the adolescent had lived with both parents during the first year of life. The findings highlight the need for appropriate treatment of childhood depression so as to reduce the adverse consequences in adulthood and for the next generation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Iceland 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 39%
Social Sciences 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2014.
All research outputs
#24,399,973
of 29,660,600 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
#1,515
of 1,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,802
of 336,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
#28
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,660,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.