↓ Skip to main content

Survey Study of Anesthesiologists' and Surgeons' Ordering of Unnecessary Preoperative Laboratory Tests

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Survey Study of Anesthesiologists' and Surgeons' Ordering of Unnecessary Preoperative Laboratory Tests
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, November 2010
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e31820034f0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nearly 20 years ago it was shown that patients are exposed to unnecessary preoperative testing that is both costly and has associated morbidity. To determine whether such unnecessary testing persists, we performed internal and external surveys to quantify the incidence of unnecessary preoperative testing and to identify strategies for reduction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Norway 2 2%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Other 27 27%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2023.
All research outputs
#10,723,471
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#4,152
of 10,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,489
of 140,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#29
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.