↓ Skip to main content

Defects in succinate dehydrogenase in gastrointestinal stromal tumors lacking KIT and PDGFRA mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Defects in succinate dehydrogenase in gastrointestinal stromal tumors lacking KIT and PDGFRA mutations
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1009199108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 218 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Master 14 6%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 52 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 14%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 54 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,689,187
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#22,028
of 118,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,886
of 254,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#92
of 785 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 785 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.