↓ Skip to main content

Distinguishing Among Prolonged, Recurrent, and Periodic Fever Syndromes: Approach of a Pediatric Infectious Diseases Subspecialist

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric clinics of North America, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Distinguishing Among Prolonged, Recurrent, and Periodic Fever Syndromes: Approach of a Pediatric Infectious Diseases Subspecialist
Published in
Pediatric clinics of North America, June 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.pcl.2005.02.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Most children with prolonged, recurrent, or periodic fever are healthy and have self-limited, common illnesses, and the primary care practitioner usually can reassure families and continue to reassess the patient as circumstances dictate. For a child with true fever of unknown origin, a pediatric infectious diseases subspecialist should be consulted. This article discusses three objectives for the clinician: (1) to categorize patterns of fever illnesses and prioritize differential diagnoses; (2) to diagnose and manage the most frequently encountered prolonged fever syndrome, deconditioning; and (3) to expand knowledge and approach to diagnosing periodic fever syndromes. The approach described in this article represents the honed, 30-year experience of a pediatric infectious diseases subspecialist.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Nepal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 22 17%
Student > Postgraduate 17 13%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 71%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2014.
All research outputs
#24,998,236
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric clinics of North America
#1,288
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,531
of 76,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric clinics of North America
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.