↓ Skip to main content

WNT-3A modulates articular chondrocyte phenotype by activating both canonical and noncanonical pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
WNT-3A modulates articular chondrocyte phenotype by activating both canonical and noncanonical pathways
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, May 2011
DOI 10.1083/jcb.201011051
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Activation and disruption of Wnt/β-catenin signaling both result in cartilage breakdown via unknown mechanisms. Here we show that both WNT-3A and the Wnt inhibitor DKK1 induced de-differentiation of human articular chondrocytes through simultaneous activation of β-catenin-dependent and independent responses. WNT-3A activates both the β-catenin-dependent canonical pathway and the Ca(2+)/CaMKII noncanonical pathways, with distinct transcriptional targets. WNT-3A promotes cell proliferation and loss of expression of the chondrocyte markers COL2A1, Aggrecan, and SOX9; however, proliferation and AXIN2 up-regulation are downstream of the canonical pathway and are rescued by DKK1, whereas the loss of differentiation markers is CaMKII dependent. Finally, we showed that in chondrocytes, the Ca(2+)/CaMKII-dependent and β-catenin-dependent pathways are reciprocally inhibitory, thereby explaining why DKK1 can induce loss of differentiation through de-repression of the CaMKII pathway. We propose a novel model in which a single WNT can simultaneously activate different pathways with distinct and independent outcomes and with reciprocal regulation. This offers an opportunity for selective pharmacological targeting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 206 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 22%
Researcher 39 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 37 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 11%
Engineering 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 44 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2026.
All research outputs
#5,906,478
of 30,703,623 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#3,901
of 12,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,207
of 140,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#14
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,703,623 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.