↓ Skip to main content

Australian seaweed collections: use and misuse

Overview of attention for article published in Phycologia, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Australian seaweed collections: use and misuse
Published in
Phycologia, May 2019
DOI 10.2216/12-089.1
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 7%
Spain 2 7%
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 23 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 43%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,708,439
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Phycologia
#446
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,336
of 352,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phycologia
#155
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.