↓ Skip to main content

On the bulk transport process and its impact on the electrode behavior of mixed conducting electrodes for SOFCs

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP), January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
On the bulk transport process and its impact on the electrode behavior of mixed conducting electrodes for SOFCs
Published in
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP), January 2017
DOI 10.1039/c7cp04103a
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The surface reaction and bulk transport processes represent two pillars in the kinetics studies of SOFC electrodes. The driving force of the ion transport process in the mixed ion-electron conductor (MIEC) electrodes is recapitulated. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are conducted on the so-called "bulk diffusion" process, along with experimental verification through the (LaSr)(CoFe)O3-δ cathode. It is proven that an electrical field will be present inside the MIEC electrode, which drives the motion of ions along with the concentration gradient. In the steady state, the distributions of ce, cv, ϕ, etc. are obtained. The impact of this electrical field on the electrode kinetics and stability is discussed. It is revealed that: (a) the equivalent PO2 at the interface calculated according to the overpotential and the Nernst equation could overestimate the stability concern. (b) From the viewpoint of the bulk pathway, polarization is not necessarily a beneficial factor, which could open up, or shut down the bulk pathway depending on the ionic defect type.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Lecturer 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 6 35%
Chemical Engineering 4 24%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2017.
All research outputs
#28,611,663
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP)
#13,636
of 21,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#367,242
of 462,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP)
#952
of 1,847 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,847 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.