You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A guide to Bayesian model selection for ecologists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Monographs, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1890/14-0661.1 |
| Authors |
M. B. Hooten, N. T. Hobbs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 10% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Sweden | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 53% |
| Scientists | 59 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 3% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1140 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 322 | 26% |
| Researcher | 249 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 201 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 68 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 5% |
| Other | 186 | 15% |
| Unknown | 133 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 579 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 274 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 37 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 20 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 1% |
| Other | 81 | 7% |
| Unknown | 210 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#393,441
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#18
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,742
of 363,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.