↓ Skip to main content

Relevant Nursing Leadership: An Evidence-Based Programmatic Response

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Relevant Nursing Leadership: An Evidence-Based Programmatic Response
Published in
International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, July 2009
DOI 10.2202/1548-923x.1792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda L Eddy, Dawn Doutrich, Zana R Higgs, Janet Spuck, Margie Olson, Stephen Weinberg

Abstract

Community and student demand for relevant nursing leadership graduate programs provided the impetus for this study. The aims were to identify components of highly competent nursing leadership, and strategies to integrate those components into education and practice. Nursing leaders gathered in five focus groups. A semi-structured interview guide was used to elicit narratives about nursing leadership. Interpretive analysis proceeded from identification of themes to uncovering of paradigm cases. Essential nursing leadership competencies comprised communication skills such as listening, conflict resolution, the ability to communicate a vision, motivate, and inspire. Additionally, leaders needed technological adroitness, fiscal dexterity, and the courage to be proactive during rapid change. Implications included a revision in the leadership focus of the nursing masters program, and the necessity that nurse retention should be enhanced by better educated nurse leaders who are grounded in practice and ready to provide a vision for the future.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Librarian 3 5%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2011.
All research outputs
#22,695,529
of 27,784,943 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
#90
of 113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,337
of 134,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,784,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them