↓ Skip to main content

A high performance 3D cluster-based test of unsmoothed fMRI data

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A high performance 3D cluster-based test of unsmoothed fMRI data
Published in
NeuroImage, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cluster-size tests (CST) based on random field theory have been widely adopted in fMRI data analysis to detect brain activation. However, most existing approaches can be used appropriately only when the image is highly smoothed in the spatial domain. Unfortunately, spatial smoothing degrades spatial specificity. Recently, a threshold-free cluster enhancement technique was proposed which does not require spatial smoothing, but this method can be used only for group level analysis. Advances in imaging technology now yield high quality high spatial resolution imaging data in single subjects and an inference approach that retains the benefits of greater spatial resolution is called for. In this work, we present a new CST with a correction for voxelation to address this problem. The theoretical formulation of the new approach based on Gaussian random fields is developed to estimate statistical significance using 3D statistical parametric maps without assuming spatial smoothness. Simulated phantom and resting-state fMRI experimental data are then used to compare the voxelation-corrected procedure to the widely used standard random field theory. Unlike standard random field theory approaches, which require heavy spatial smoothing, the new approach has a higher sensitivity for localizing activation regions without the requirement of spatial smoothness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 32%
Psychology 6 15%
Engineering 5 12%
Mathematics 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,518,326
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#8,822
of 12,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,511
of 241,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#111
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.