| Title |
Early Experience of a Safety Net Provider Reorganizing into an Accountable Care Organization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1215/03616878-2744284 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen Hacker, Palmira Santos, Douglas Thompson, Somava S Stout, Adriana Bearse, Robert E Mechanic |
| Abstract |
Although safety-net providers will benefit from health insurance expansions under the Affordable Care Act, they also face significant challenges in the postreform environment. Some have embraced the concept of the accountable care organization to help improve quality and efficiency while addressing financial shortfalls. The experience of Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA) in Massachusetts, where health care reform began six years ago, provides insight into the opportunities and challenges of this approach in the safety net. CHA's strategies include care redesign, financial realignment, workforce transformation, and development of external partnerships. Early results show some improvement in access, patient experience, quality, and utilization; however, the potential efficiencies will not eliminate CHA's current operating deficit. The patient population, payer mix, service mix, cost structure, and political requirements reduce the likelihood of financial sustainability without significant changes in these factors, increased public funding, or both. Thus the future of safety-net institutions, regardless of payment and care redesign success, remains at risk. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |