↓ Skip to main content

Rational Design and Bioimaging Applications of Highly Selective Fluorescence Probes for Hydrogen Polysulfides

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rational Design and Bioimaging Applications of Highly Selective Fluorescence Probes for Hydrogen Polysulfides
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, May 2014
DOI 10.1021/ja502968x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Reactive sulfur species have received considerable attention due to their various biological functions. Among these molecules, hydrogen polysulfides (H2Sn, n > 1) are recently suggested to be the actual signaling molecules derived from hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Hydrogen polysulfides may also have their own biosynthetic pathways. The research on H2Sn is rapidly growing. However, the detection of H2Sn is still challenging. In this work we report a H2Sn-mediated benzodithiolone formation under mild conditions. Based on this reaction, specific fluorescent probes for H2Sn are prepared and evaluated. The probe DSP-3 shows good selectivity and sensitivity for H2Sn.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 28%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 25 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Engineering 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,737,468
of 34,300,846 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#27,698
of 90,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,036
of 275,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#202
of 538 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,300,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 538 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.