↓ Skip to main content

流行性出血熱の流行学的調査研究

Overview of attention for article published in Kansenshōgaku zasshi The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
流行性出血熱の流行学的調査研究
Published in
Kansenshōgaku zasshi The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, November 2011
DOI 10.11552/kansenshogakuzasshi1926.41.337
Authors

池田 苗夫

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,907,061
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Kansenshōgaku zasshi The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
#248
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,001
of 248,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kansenshōgaku zasshi The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.