↓ Skip to main content

The Need for Performance Measures on Testing for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Primary Care

Overview of attention for article published in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Need for Performance Measures on Testing for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Primary Care
Published in
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, July 2011
DOI 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37039-0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The millions of people living in the United States with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) represent a reservoir of potentially active tuberculosis (TB) disease. When LTBI is left to activate, the consequences may include intense suffering, permanent disability, and high economic costs for patients, their caretakers, and society at large as TB spreads. The introduction of performance measures would improve accountability for quality of care and to reduce disparities, especially if the measures are group-targeted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 35%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 32 34%