↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of the National Health Service abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme in England

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Surgery, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
guideline
6 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cost-effectiveness of the National Health Service abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme in England
Published in
British Journal of Surgery, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/bjs.9528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 44%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 36 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,584,603
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#598
of 8,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,788
of 274,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.