↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Night Operations in South East England

Overview of attention for article published in Air Medical Journal, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Night Operations in South East England
Published in
Air Medical Journal, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.amj.2017.06.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study sought to assess the impact of a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) capable of night operations. This is a retrospective case review of all night HEMS missions attended by a charity air ambulance service in South East England over a 2-year period (October 1, 2013, to October 1, 2015). During the 2-year trial period, the HEMS service undertook a total of 5,004 missions and attended to 3,728 patients. Of these, 1,373 missions, or 27.4% of the total HEMS activity, were night missions. Night missions increased from year 1 (n = 617) to year 2 (n = 756). A mean of 1.9 missions per night were conducted, resulting in the treatment of 1.3 patients per night. A higher proportion of patients were transported to a major trauma center at night (64% vs. 51%, χ(2) = 41.8, P < .0001). Weather conditions prevented HEMS from responding at night via air for 15% of the night operational hours. A 2-year trial period of a night HEMS service in South East England showed the predicted activation rate, with a mean of 1.3 patients attended to per night. Patients transported to a major trauma center had a mean Injury Severity Score of 23. Further research is warranted to determine if the night HEMS service conveys a patient outcome benefit.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#26,437,283
of 31,715,120 outputs
Outputs from Air Medical Journal
#609
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,909
of 344,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Air Medical Journal
#9
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,715,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.