↓ Skip to main content

High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
53 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
1532 Mendeley
citeulike
36 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1017351108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,532 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 53 3%
Germany 16 1%
Netherlands 11 <1%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Brazil 10 <1%
Japan 7 <1%
Sweden 6 <1%
France 6 <1%
Italy 5 <1%
Other 43 3%
Unknown 1365 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 387 25%
Researcher 375 24%
Student > Master 183 12%
Student > Bachelor 92 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 83 5%
Other 254 17%
Unknown 158 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 874 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 221 14%
Computer Science 123 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 2%
Environmental Science 21 1%
Other 82 5%
Unknown 188 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,401,081
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#19,208
of 118,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,173
of 252,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#79
of 772 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 772 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.