↓ Skip to main content

Intrinsic Rewards, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, and Habit Strength: A Three‐Wave Study Testing the Associative‐Cybernetic Model

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychology: Health & Well-Being, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intrinsic Rewards, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, and Habit Strength: A Three‐Wave Study Testing the Associative‐Cybernetic Model
Published in
Applied Psychology: Health & Well-Being, November 2013
DOI 10.1111/aphw.12020
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Habit formation is thought to lead to long-term maintenance of fruit and vegetable consumption. Habits develop through context-dependent repetition, but additional variables such as intrinsic reward of behaviour may influence habit strength. Drawing upon the Associative-Cybernetic Model, this exploratory study tested different pathways by which intrinsic reward may influence fruit and vegetable consumption habit strength.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 28%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 8%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2014.
All research outputs
#28,597,744
of 34,357,314 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychology: Health & Well-Being
#507
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,687
of 259,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychology: Health & Well-Being
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.