Stability and Flexibility of the Message Carried by Semiochemical Stimuli, as Revealed by Devaluation of Carbon Disulfide Followed by Social Transmission of Food Preference
Semiochemicals are volatile compounds that communicate specific meaning between individuals and elicit specific behavioral and/or physiological responses mediated by highly sensitive and highly specific olfactory pathways. Recent work suggests that semiochemicals can activate multiple olfactory pathways at once, but the degree to which parallel pathways activated by the same semiochemical interact and what the behavioral consequences of such interactions are remains a topic of debate. Here, we approached this question behaviorally, investigating whether rats could be trained to avoid carbon disulfide (CS2; conditional stimulus) via taste-potentiated odor aversion, and asking whether any such learning would have an impact on rats' subsequent use of CS2 as a semiochemical cue (i.e., in a socially transmitted food preference paradigm). The results show that CS2-mediated food preference learning is unimpaired by aversions conditioned to CS2, a result indicating that canonical and semiochemical pathways for the processing of CS2 function in a largely independent manner. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Neuroscience
#704
of 3,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,721
of 319,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Neuroscience
#16
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
