↓ Skip to main content

HuD Regulates Coding and Noncoding RNA to Induce APP→Aβ Processing

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
HuD Regulates Coding and Noncoding RNA to Induce APP→Aβ Processing
Published in
Cell Reports, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.050
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The primarily neuronal RNA-binding protein HuD is implicated in learning and memory. Here, we report the identification of several HuD target transcripts linked to Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. HuD interacted with the 3' UTRs of APP mRNA (encoding amyloid precursor protein) and BACE1 mRNA (encoding β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1) and increased the half-lives of these mRNAs. HuD also associated with and stabilized the long noncoding (lnc)RNA BACE1AS, which partly complements BACE1 mRNA and enhances BACE1 expression. Consistent with HuD promoting production of APP and APP-cleaving enzyme, the levels of APP, BACE1, BACE1AS, and Aβ were higher in the brain of HuD-overexpressing mice. Importantly, cortex (superior temporal gyrus) from patients with AD displayed significantly higher levels of HuD and, accordingly, elevated APP, BACE1, BACE1AS, and Aβ than did cortical tissue from healthy age-matched individuals. We propose that HuD jointly promotes the production of APP and the cleavage of its amyloidogenic fragment, Aβ.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 134 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 38 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 19%
Neuroscience 22 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 40 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2015.
All research outputs
#9,227,241
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#11,195
of 14,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,671
of 243,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#135
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.