↓ Skip to main content

Intraoral pressures produced by thirteen semi-occluded vocal tract gestures

Overview of attention for article published in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intraoral pressures produced by thirteen semi-occluded vocal tract gestures
Published in
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, May 2014
DOI 10.3109/14015439.2014.913074
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The use of semi-occluded vocal tract (SOVT) exercises as habilitative and rehabilitative tools has grown substantially in the past two decades. As the use of these exercises has grown, so too has the number of variations of the phonatory gestures used to create oral semi-occlusions. While much of the research on SOVT exercises to this point has been conducted using straw phonation, there has been little discussion or investigation regarding how other phonatory gestures that are considered to be SOVT compare to one another. The current study sought to measure the intraoral pressure produced by 13 phonatory gestures generally thought of as oral semi-occlusions. Twenty subjects (10 male, 10 female) produced three tokens of each gesture, and intraoral pressure was recorded via a thin, flexible-cannula pressure transducer. Pressures ranged between 0.1 and 1.0 kPa, but varied significantly between gestures and between subjects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 7 7%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 40 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 41 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#25,785,386
of 32,097,703 outputs
Outputs from Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
#163
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,991
of 261,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,097,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.