↓ Skip to main content

ロクス・アモエヌス(心地よき場)としてのルネサンス庭園と場所記憶術 : アゴスティーノ・デル・リッチョ(1541-98)の理想庭園計画にみられる記憶術的空間構成と百科全書的知の表象

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ロクス・アモエヌス(心地よき場)としてのルネサンス庭園と場所記憶術 : アゴスティーノ・デル・リッチョ(1541-98)の理想庭園計画にみられる記憶術的空間構成と百科全書的知の表象
Published in
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), January 2003
DOI 10.3130/aija.68.239
Authors

桑木野 幸治

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,523,434
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#305
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,481
of 136,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.