↓ Skip to main content

Poly(DL‐lactic acid) film surface modification with heparin for improving hemocompatibility of blood‐contacting bioresorbable devices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Poly(DL‐lactic acid) film surface modification with heparin for improving hemocompatibility of blood‐contacting bioresorbable devices
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, April 2011
DOI 10.1002/jbm.a.33099
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This work describes a simple method to immobilize heparin by covalent bonding to the surface of poly(lactic acid) film with the aim of showing improved hemocompatibility. Carboxyl groups present in heparin molecules were activated by reaction with N-hydroxy-succinimide and allowed to react with free amino groups created at the surface of poly(DL-lactic acid) films by controlled aminolysis. Contact angle measurements and XPS analysis confirmed the binding. Quantification was determined by radioactivity using heparin labeled with tritium. The surface exhibited anti factor Xa activity, thus confirming the presence of bounded heparin that kept some biological activity. Finally platelets adhesion showed less platelet adhesion on heparin modified films as well as preserved morphology.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Student > Master 4 21%
Other 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 26%
Materials Science 3 16%
Engineering 2 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#24,756,754
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#2,807
of 3,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,539
of 162,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#37
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.