↓ Skip to main content

Drivers of Costs Associated With Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Drivers of Costs Associated With Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Stroke
Published in
Stroke, May 2014
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.113.003874
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III study tested the effect of intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) alone when compared with intravenous tPA followed by endovascular therapy and collected cost data to assess the economic implications of the 2 therapies. This report describes the factors affecting the costs of the initial hospitalization for acute stroke subjects from the United States.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 34 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,340,207
of 27,412,402 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#3,673
of 13,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,527
of 245,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#34
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,412,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.