↓ Skip to main content

Moving Narcissus

Overview of attention for article published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
9 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Moving Narcissus
Published in
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, May 2014
DOI 10.1177/0146167214535812
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Empathy plays a critical role in fostering and maintaining social relations. Narcissists lack empathy, and this may account for their interpersonal failures. But why do narcissists lack empathy? Are they incapable, or is change possible? Three studies addressed this question. Study 1 showed that the link between narcissism and low empathy generalizes to a specific target person presented in a vignette. The effect was driven by maladaptive narcissistic components (i.e., entitlement, exploitativeness, exhibitionism). Study 2 examined the effect of perspective-taking (vs. control) instructions on self-reported responses to a video. Study 3 examined the effect of the same manipulation on autonomic arousal (heart rate [HR]) during an audio-recording. Perspective-taking ameliorated negative links between maladaptive narcissism and both self-reported empathy and HR. That is, narcissists can be moved by another's suffering, if they take that person's perspective. The findings demonstrate that narcissists' low empathy does not reflect inability, implying potential for intervention.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 199 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Master 24 12%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 51 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 111 54%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 58 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 230. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2025.
All research outputs
#203,423
of 32,932,292 outputs
Outputs from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#136
of 3,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,363
of 264,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,932,292 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.