↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of basic oral care for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user
guideline
5 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
412 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systematic review of basic oral care for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00520-013-1942-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah B. McGuire, Janet S. Fulton, Jumin Park, Carlton G. Brown, M. Elvira P. Correa, June Eilers, Sharon Elad, Faith Gibson, Loree K. Oberle-Edwards, Joanne Bowen, Rajesh V. Lalla, On behalf of the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO)

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Unknown 410 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 16%
Student > Bachelor 55 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 8%
Student > Postgraduate 27 7%
Researcher 26 6%
Other 78 19%
Unknown 130 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 140 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,792,377
of 28,766,646 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#214
of 5,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,397
of 217,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,766,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.