↓ Skip to main content

Field validation supports novel niche modeling strategies in a cryptic endangered amphibian

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Field validation supports novel niche modeling strategies in a cryptic endangered amphibian
Published in
Ecography, May 2014
DOI 10.1111/ecog.00733
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
Brazil 4 3%
United States 2 1%
Denmark 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 127 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 26%
Researcher 34 24%
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 65%
Environmental Science 23 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 16 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2014.
All research outputs
#10,345,754
of 30,032,168 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#1,743
of 2,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,013
of 249,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,032,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.