↓ Skip to main content

IMRT QA using machine learning: A multi‐institutional validation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
IMRT QA using machine learning: A multi‐institutional validation
Published in
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/acm2.12161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 40 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 44 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Engineering 6 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 57 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2024.
All research outputs
#5,606,175
of 26,816,824 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#122
of 2,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,298
of 332,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#6
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,816,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.