↓ Skip to main content

Power training using pneumatic machines vs. plate-loaded machines to improve muscle power in older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Gerontology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Power training using pneumatic machines vs. plate-loaded machines to improve muscle power in older adults
Published in
Experimental Gerontology, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.exger.2017.08.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Professor 10 6%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 62 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 34 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Engineering 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 68 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,265,252
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Gerontology
#158
of 3,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,410
of 349,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Gerontology
#4
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.