↓ Skip to main content

Exploratory Study of the Clinical Utility of the Pizzi Healthy Weight Management Assessment (PHWMA) Among Burmese High School Students

Overview of attention for article published in American journal of occupational therapy, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exploratory Study of the Clinical Utility of the Pizzi Healthy Weight Management Assessment (PHWMA) Among Burmese High School Students
Published in
American journal of occupational therapy, July 2016
DOI 10.5014/ajot.2016.021659
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Immigrant youth in the United States are at greater risk for weight management problems than non-Hispanic White youth. We used the Pizzi Healthy Weight Management Assessment (PHWMA) to capture data on health perceptions and weight management behaviors among adolescent Burmese refugees. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of 20 Burmese refugee high school students. The results captured an understanding of health perceptions and weight management behaviors of the program participants. The PHWMA was found to be a valid and reliable tool for use by occupational therapy practitioners. Findings from this study can inform program development and evaluation in outreach efforts to enhance minority youths' health and well-being.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 31 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Psychology 11 10%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2017.
All research outputs
#28,639,288
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from American journal of occupational therapy
#1,325
of 1,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,552
of 335,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American journal of occupational therapy
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.