Hypophosphatemia is commonly observed in critically ill patients. Inorganic phosphorus is quantified by spectrophotometric measurement of a phosphomolybdate complex, a method with multiple documented interferents. Our clinical laboratory was contacted to investigate a case of asymptomatic hypophosphatemia in a patient receiving high-dose liposomal amphotericin B therapy (L-AMB).
In vitro experiments were performed by spiking L-AMB into residual plasma specimens. Phosphate was measured on the Beckman Coulter AU and Ortho Diagnostics Vitros instruments.
When measured on the AU, phosphate in plasma with approximately 250mcg/mL of L-AMB demonstrated a median negative bias of 3.45mg/dL relative to unspiked samples. In contrast, Vitros phosphate measurements demonstrated excellent agreement for specimens with and without L-AMB (median bias -0.2mg/dL).
High L-AMB concentrations induced a significant negative bias on phosphate measured by the AU assay, but did not affect the Vitros assay. Laboratorians and clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon in patients receiving L-AMB who develop unexplained hypophosphatemia.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biochemistry
#1,493
of 2,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,228
of 330,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biochemistry
#19
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
