↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions towards lesbian, gay and bisexual people in residential care facilities: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Older People Nursing, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Perceptions towards lesbian, gay and bisexual people in residential care facilities: a qualitative study
Published in
International Journal of Older People Nursing, June 2014
DOI 10.1111/opn.12058
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Internationally, increases in the numbers of older people will be reflected in larger numbers of more socioculturally diverse groups of older people requiring care provided by residential care facilities. Covert and overt instances of homophobia are evident within residential care services provided to older lesbian, gay and bisexual people.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Psychology 7 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#5,141,048
of 30,083,264 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Older People Nursing
#69
of 535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,949
of 248,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Older People Nursing
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,083,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.