↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: A scoping review of the evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Nursing Outlook, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Determinants of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: A scoping review of the evidence
Published in
Nursing Outlook, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.06.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are prevalent in people with neurodegenerative diseases. In this scoping review the Kales, Gitlin and Lykestos framework is used to answer the question: What high quality evidence exists for the patient, caregiver and environmental determinants of five specific BPSD: aggression, agitation, apathy, depression and psychosis? An a priori review protocol was developed; 692 of 6013 articles retrieved in the search were deemed eligible for review. Gough's Weight of Evidence Framework and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias were used. The findings from 56 high quality/low bias articles are summarized. Each symptom had its own set of determinants, but many were common across several symptoms: neurodegeneration, type of dementia, severity of cognitive impairments, and declining functional abilities, and to a lesser extent, caregiver burden and communication. Research and policy implications are relevant to the National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 309 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Student > Master 23 7%
Researcher 19 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 142 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 47 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 13%
Psychology 27 9%
Neuroscience 14 5%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 145 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2025.
All research outputs
#3,315,341
of 32,718,554 outputs
Outputs from Nursing Outlook
#132
of 1,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,796
of 338,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nursing Outlook
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,718,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.