↓ Skip to main content

Markers of Inflammation in the Breath in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Markers of Inflammation in the Breath in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, October 2014
DOI 10.1097/mpg.0000000000000450
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Breath analysis and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) collection are simple and non-invasive processes whereby inflammatory mediators and other biomarkers can be assessed in diseases that affect the lung. It was hypothesised that markers of epithelial dysfunction and secretion, such as a low pH, 8-isoprostane, and release of epithelial factors such as trefoil factor 2 (TFF2) and mucin would be elevated in the breath of those with inflammatory bowel disease. The aim was to compare the levels of these biomarkers in EBC and the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in children with Crohn's disease (CD), asthma and in normal subjects in a pilot study.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2015.
All research outputs
#11,533,864
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#3,426
of 7,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,201
of 298,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#36
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.