↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of New Zealand osteopathy patients experiences of their treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluation of New Zealand osteopathy patients experiences of their treatment
Published in
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rochelle Judkins, Brett Vaughan, Jane Mulcahy

Abstract

To investigate the experiences of patients seeking osteopathy treatment in New Zealand; and to describe their perceptions of osteopathic treatment. Survey-based research design. Private osteopathy practices. Demographic survey and the Patient Perception Measure-Osteopathy (PPM-O). Twelve osteopaths were recruited as practitioners. Responses from 107 patients were analysed. Approximately 75% of patients reported receiving a 'mostly cranial' treatment approach. The majority of patients (96.2%) indicated that osteopathic treatment helped their condition. The most frequently experienced sensation was 'relaxed'. A positive relationship was observed between the PPM-O and demographic variables. This is the first study to report on New Zealand osteopathy patient's experience of their treatment. The sensations and emotions experienced are largely consistent with previous Australian research. Predominantly positive perceptions of osteopathic treatment were reported. The current study provides some evidence of the construct validity of the PPM-O in a New Zealand patient population.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 20%
Student > Master 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,219,685
of 34,267,958 outputs
Outputs from Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
#350
of 1,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,971
of 357,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,267,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.