↓ Skip to main content

Climate change and Arctic ecosystems: 2. Modeling, paleodata‐model comparisons, and future projections

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Climate change and Arctic ecosystems: 2. Modeling, paleodata‐model comparisons, and future projections
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, October 2003
DOI 10.1029/2002jd002559
Authors

J. O. Kaplan, N. H. Bigelow, I. C. Prentice, S. P. Harrison, P. J. Bartlein, T. R. Christensen, W. Cramer, N. V. Matveyeva, A. D. McGuire, D. F. Murray, V. Y. Razzhivin, B. Smith, D. A. Walker, P. M. Anderson, A. A. Andreev, L. B. Brubaker, M. E. Edwards, A. V. Lozhkin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Germany 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 286 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 78 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 25%
Student > Master 27 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 5%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 41 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 103 33%
Environmental Science 68 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 21%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 54 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,760,513
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#1,872
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,874
of 56,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#17
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.