↓ Skip to main content

Short communication: A study of Lactobacillus isolates' adherence to and influence on membrane integrity of human Caco-2 cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Dairy Science, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Short communication: A study of Lactobacillus isolates' adherence to and influence on membrane integrity of human Caco-2 cells
Published in
Journal of Dairy Science, August 2017
DOI 10.3168/jds.2017-12912
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The selection criteria of ideal probiotic bacteria are complex and involve many factors. One key criterion is based on the ability of the probiotic bacteria to adhere to the epithelial lining of the gastrointestinal tract. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the adherence and influence on membrane integrity of 2 selected lactobacilli isolates-Lactobacillus rhamnosus MI13 (dairy food origin) and L. plantarum RC2 (bovine rumen origin)-to Caco-2 cells in the presence and absence of Escherichia coli. The adhesion and influence on membrane integrity properties of the 2 Lactobacillus isolates were compared with Escherichia coli, a human commensal bacterium. From the adhesion studies, we concluded that the bovine rumen isolate exhibited better adherence to Caco-2 cells than the dairy food isolate. In contrast, the dairy food isolate better protected the Caco-2 monolayer from damage induced by ethanol.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 13 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Dairy Science
#7,516
of 11,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,465
of 327,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Dairy Science
#126
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.