To determine the effect of fine motor activity and nondominant-hand training on cataract surgical simulator (Eyesi) performance.
Departments of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, and Veterans Affairs Health Care Systems, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Prospective controlled trial.
Medical students completed a questionnaire and baseline microsurgical dexterity evaluation using the following 3 surgical simulator tasks: navigation, forceps, and bimanual. Participants were randomized to control (16) or intervention (17) consisting of writing, completing a labyrinth, eating, and brushing teeth once per day with their nondominant hand. Participants returned 4 weeks after baseline evaluation for follow-up simulator testing.
Of the 33 students, regular video game players had greater baseline scores than nonplayers on navigation (P = .021) and bimanual tasks (P = .089). All participants showed statistically significant improvements in all 3 tasks at follow-up after a single baseline evaluation on the surgical simulator (navigation: P = .004; forceps: P < .001; bimanual: P = .004). Nondominant-hand training with daily activities did not show statistically significant differences for dominant hands or nondominant hands. The intervention group (n = 17) trended toward greater improvement than the control group (n = 16) in navigation (14.78 versus 7.06; P = .445) and bimanual tasks (15.2 versus 6.0; P = .324) at follow-up.
Regular video game play enhanced baseline microsurgical performance measured on the surgical simulator. Simulation performance improved significantly in the intervention group and control group after 1 session on the simulator. Although not statistically significant, training the nondominant hand with daily activities showed a trend toward improved navigation and bimanual performance.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,523,434
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
#2,093
of 3,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,809
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
