↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of Optimal Outcome in Toddlers Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predictors of Optimal Outcome in Toddlers Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0340-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is usually taken to be permanent. In this study, 13 two-year-old children with ASD lost the diagnosis by age 4, at which time they scored within the normal range on standardized measures of cognitive and adaptive functioning. No differences were found in symptom severity, socialization, or communication between children who lost the ASD diagnosis and children who did not, but children with PDD-NOS were significantly more likely than those with full autistic disorder to move off the spectrum. The clearest distinguishing factor was motor skills at age 2. Results support the idea that some toddlers with ASD can lose their diagnosis and suggest that this is difficult to predict.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 273 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 15%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 60 22%
Unknown 71 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 11%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Neuroscience 11 4%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 87 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2025.
All research outputs
#3,392,867
of 34,519,212 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,262
of 6,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,350
of 229,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,519,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.