↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
3D Visualization of Individual Regenerating Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons Reveals Surprisingly Complex Growth Paths
Published in
eNeuro, August 2017
DOI 10.1523/eneuro.0093-17.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the sole output cells of the retina, are a heterogeneous population of neurons that project axons to visual targets in the brain. Like most CNS neurons, RGCs are considered incapable of mounting long distance axon regeneration. Using immunolabeling-enabled 3D imaging of solvent-cleared organs (iDISCO) in transgenic mice, we tracked the entire paths of individual RGC axons and show that adult RGCs are highly capable of spontaneous long-distance regeneration, even without any treatment. Our results show that the Thy1-H-YFP mouse sparsely labels RGCs, consisting predominantly of regeneration-competent α-type RGCs (αRGCs). Following optic nerve crush, many of the YFP-labeled RGC axons extend considerable distances proximal to the injury site with only a few penetrating through the lesion. This tortuous axon growth proximal to the lesion site is even more striking with intravitreal ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) treatment. We further demonstrate that despite traveling more than 5 mm (i.e., a distance equal to the length of mouse optic nerve), many of these circuitous axons are confined to the injury area and fail to reach the brain. Our results re-evaluate the view that RGCs are naturally incapable of re-extending long axons, and shift the focus from promoting axon elongation, to understanding factors that prevent direct growth of axons through the lesion and the injured nerve.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 28%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Professor 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 25 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,461,572
of 26,875,495 outputs
Outputs from eNeuro
#984
of 2,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,472
of 330,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eNeuro
#20
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,875,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.