↓ Skip to main content

The ketogenic diet increases mitochondrial uncoupling protein levels and activity

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Neurology, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
patent
8 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
11 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The ketogenic diet increases mitochondrial uncoupling protein levels and activity
Published in
Annals of Neurology, March 2004
DOI 10.1002/ana.20062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick G. Sullivan, Nancy A. Rippy, Kristina Dorenbos, Rachele C. Concepcion, Aakash K. Agarwal, Jong M. Rho

Abstract

Fatty acids are known to enhance mitochondrial uncoupling protein (UCP) activity. We asked whether a high-fat ketogenic diet (KD) increases UCP levels and activity in hippocampi of juvenile mice. Maximum mitochondrial respiration rates were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in KD- versus standard diet (SD)-treated animals, indicating increased UCP-mediated proton conductance that can reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Western blots showed significant (p < 0.05) or borderline significant increases in UCP2, UCP4, and UCP5 protein levels, and increased immunoreactivity to these three UCP isoforms was most prominently seen in the dentate gyrus of KD-fed mice. Finally, we found that oligomycin-induced ROS production was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in KD-fed mice than in SD controls. Collectively, our data suggest that a KD may exert neuroprotective effects by diminishing ROS production through activation of mitochondrial UCPs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 227 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 18%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Other 14 6%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 55 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 16%
Neuroscience 28 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 60 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2025.
All research outputs
#2,256,310
of 34,043,423 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#968
of 6,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,651
of 88,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,043,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.