To examine the frequency of and factors associated with emergency department (ED) intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor placement in severe paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Retrospective, multicentre cohort study of children <18 years admitted to the ED with severe TBI and intubated for >48 hours from 2007 to 2011.
Two hundred and twenty-four children had severe TBI and 75% underwent either ED, operating room (OR) or paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) ICP monitor placement. Four out of five centres placed ICP monitors in the ED, mostly (83%) fibreoptic. Nearly 40% of the patients who received ICP monitors get it placed in the ED (29% overall). Factors associated with ED ICP monitor placement were as follows: age 13 to <18 year olds compared to infants (aRR 2.02; 95% CI 1.37, 2.98), longer ED length of stay (LOS) (aRR 1.15; 95% CI 1.08, 1.21), trauma centre designation paediatric only I/II compared to adult/paediatric I/II (aRR 1.71; 95% CI 1.48, 1.98) and higher mean paediatric TBI patient volume (aRR 1.88;95% CI 1.68, 2.11). Adjusted for centre, higher bedside ED staff was associated with longer ED LOS (aRR 2.10; 95% CI 1.06, 4.14).
ICP monitors are frequently placed in the ED at paediatric trauma centres caring for children with severe TBI. Both patient and organizational level factors are associated with ED ICP monitor placement.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,567,909
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Brain Injury
#1,148
of 1,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,515
of 317,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Injury
#24
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
