↓ Skip to main content

Endogenous Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Increasing Problem Among Intravenous Drug Users

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
30 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Endogenous Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Increasing Problem Among Intravenous Drug Users
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2017
DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.10585
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Psychology 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,725,053
of 34,709,857 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#12,354
of 42,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,357
of 358,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#191
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,709,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.