↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

DEET-based insect repellents: safety implications for children and pregnant and lactating women.

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
DEET-based insect repellents: safety implications for children and pregnant and lactating women.
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, August 2003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gideon Koren, Doreen Matsui, Benoit Bailey

Abstract

Reducing the risk of mosquito bites is currently the only way to reduce the risk of West Nile virus infection. Methods for avoiding mosquito bites include limiting the time spent outdoors at dawn and dusk, wearing protective clothing and using an insect repellent. Repellents containing DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide, also known as N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) are the most effective and most widely used. However, concerns have been raised over the risk of adverse toxic effects, especially in young children and pregnant and lactating women. In this article, we review the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of DEET-based products. The evidence does not support increased risk in young children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 204 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 17%
Researcher 34 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Student > Master 20 9%
Other 19 9%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 48 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Chemistry 12 6%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 50 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 213. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#183,537
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#336
of 9,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119
of 53,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.